Progressive Leasing Settlement: $175 Million in Rent-to-Own Refunds
Last updated: July 30, 2026
The Progressive Leasing settlement is a $175 million Federal Trade Commission order over rent-to-own payment plans that were advertised as "no interest" or "same as cash" when, the FTC said, customers frequently paid about twice an item's sticker price. There was never a claim form. In June 2021 the FTC mailed more than $172 million in checks to over two million people, averaging $85 each. In September 2025 it sent a second round — 1,221,146 checks totaling more than $27 million — because money was still left in the fund.
The second round was not open to everyone. It went only to people who cashed their first check and who had paid Progressive Leasing $616.62 or more. Those checks had to be cashed within 90 days of the date printed on them, so that window has now closed. If you believe you qualified and no check arrived, call the refund administrator, Rust Consulting, at 1-877-625-9449 and ask whether a payment was issued in your name.
Progressive Leasing, legally Prog Leasing, LLC, offers lease-to-own financing at the checkout of more than 24,000 retail stores, including Big Lots, Mattress Firm, Cricket Wireless, Conn's, Kay Jewelers, Art Van Furniture, Best Buy, and Zales. Shoppers use it to take home furniture, appliances, jewelry, electronics, and phones by making periodic payments instead of paying the full price up front.
According to the FTC's complaint, shoppers were told at the register that the plans were "same as cash" or carried "no interest," leading them to believe they would not pay more than the sticker price. To see the real total cost, a customer had to click a nondescript dropdown arrow labeled "Additional Lease Details." The FTC said Progressive knew people were confused: it had received tens of thousands of complaints, including more than 15,000 in a single 15-month period.
Key facts
- Settlement amount
- $175 million
- First distribution
- More than $172 million, June 2021
- People paid in round one
- More than 2 million, averaging $85 each
- Second distribution
- More than $27 million, September 2025
- Checks in round two
- 1,221,146
- Round two eligibility
- Cashed your first check and paid $616.62 or more
- Claim form required
- None — the FTC used company records
- Typical harm alleged
- About twice the sticker price if all payments were made
- Retail locations
- More than 24,000 stores
- Case
- FTC v. Prog Leasing, LLC, No. 1:20-cv-01668 (N.D. Ga.), FTC File No. 182 3127
- Complaint filed
- April 20, 2020
- Order entered
- April 22, 2020
- Refund administrator
- Rust Consulting, 1-877-625-9449
Official settlement administrator: Federal Trade Commission — Progressive Leasing Refunds
Who qualifies
- The first round in June 2021 paid more than two million people who had used a Progressive Leasing rent-to-own plan and overpaid relative to what they had been led to expect. No claim was required — the FTC identified recipients from company records.
- The second round in September 2025 applied two extra conditions: you had to have cashed your first check, and you had to have paid Progressive Leasing $616.62 or more.
- That $616.62 threshold is the single most common reason someone got a first check but no second one. Cashing the first check alone was not enough.
- Payment came as a paper check that had to be cashed within 90 days of the date printed on it. Both rounds' windows have now closed.
- There was never an application, deadline, or proof requirement for consumers in either round.
- The case covered Progressive Leasing's own plans. Other rent-to-own or buy-now-pay-later providers used by the same retailers were not part of this settlement.
The Progressive Leasing settlement — what happened
- 1
April 20, 2020 — the FTC sues and Progressive settles the same week
The FTC filed its complaint and a proposed stipulated order in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against Prog Leasing, LLC, doing business as Progressive Leasing (No. 1:20-cv-01668, FTC File No. 182 3127). The court entered the stipulated order on April 22, 2020. The Commission vote authorizing the filing was 3-2, with Commissioners Rohit Chopra and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter dissenting.
- 2
What customers were told at the register
The FTC alleged that shoppers buying furniture, jewelry, cellphones, and other high-ticket items were frequently told Progressive's plans were "same as cash" or carried "no interest," which led them to believe they would not be charged more than the item's sticker price. What they were shown was the item's cash price, their initial payment, and each periodic payment.
- 3
What the plans actually cost
According to the complaint, customers paid more than the sticker price and frequently paid approximately twice the sticker price if they made all of their scheduled payments. To see the full cost of the plan before agreeing to it, a customer had to click a nondescript dropdown arrow next to the words "Additional Lease Details."
- 4
The company knew people were confused
The FTC said Progressive was aware of widespread customer confusion about its terms through tens of thousands of consumer complaints — including more than 15,000 received in just one 15-month period.
- 5
June 2021 — more than $172 million mailed to over two million people
The FTC mailed refund checks averaging $85 each. Because of the sheer number of payments, the checks went out over roughly two weeks. Recipients had 90 days to deposit or cash them.
- 6
September 2025 — a second round of 1,221,146 checks
Money was still left in the fund, in large part because not every check from 2021 was cashed. The FTC sent a second round totaling more than $27 million, but restricted it to people who had cashed their first check and had paid Progressive Leasing $616.62 or more — which works out to roughly $22 per check.
- 7
What the order requires going forward
Beyond the money, the order bars Progressive from misrepresenting the cost, terms, or nature of its plans. It must clearly and conspicuously disclose the total cost to own a product when marketing a plan, and must get a customer's express, informed consent before charging or billing them. It is also required to monitor third parties, including the retailers that offer its plans in stores, to make sure their marketing complies.
- 8
Rent-to-own is a recurring source of these cases
The pattern in this case — a headline price at the register and the real total cost one click away — repeats across rent-to-own, lease-to-own, and buy-now-pay-later products. ClaimBee tracks these settlements as they land, including the automatic ones where the only thing standing between you and a payment is an out-of-date mailing address.
Missed this one? Don't miss the next.
ClaimBee matches your profile against 2,000+ active settlements, shows payout and proof requirements up front, and tracks every deadline for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I still get money from the Progressive Leasing settlement?
There was never a claim form, and both rounds of checks have been mailed and expired — June 2021 and September 2025, each with a 90-day cashing window. If you believe you qualified and no check arrived, or one arrived and expired uncashed, call the refund administrator, Rust Consulting, at 1-877-625-9449 to ask whether a payment was issued in your name.
Why didn't I get a second Progressive Leasing check?
The September 2025 round had two conditions beyond qualifying in the first place: you had to have cashed your first check, and you had to have paid Progressive Leasing $616.62 or more. People who never cashed the 2021 check, or who paid less than $616.62 in total, were not included in the second round.
How much was the Progressive Leasing settlement per person?
In the June 2021 round, more than two million people received checks averaging $85 each. In the September 2025 round, the FTC sent more than $27 million across 1,221,146 checks, which works out to roughly $22 each. Individual amounts varied based on what each person had paid Progressive Leasing.
Did I need to file a claim for the Progressive Leasing refund?
No. The FTC identified eligible customers from Progressive Leasing's own records and mailed checks automatically in both rounds. There was never an application or a deadline for consumers. Any website offering to file a Progressive Leasing claim for you, particularly for a fee, was not legitimate.
What did Progressive Leasing do wrong?
The FTC alleged that Progressive Leasing misled shoppers about the true price of items bought through its rent-to-own plans. Customers were frequently told the plans were "same as cash" or "no interest," but they paid more than the sticker price and frequently about twice the sticker price if they made all their scheduled payments. The full cost was disclosed only behind a nondescript "Additional Lease Details" dropdown.
Which stores offer Progressive Leasing?
Progressive Leasing markets rent-to-own payment plans in more than 24,000 retail locations and online. The FTC's refund notice named Big Lots, Mattress Firm, Cricket Wireless, Conn's, Kay Jewelers, Art Van Furniture, Best Buy, and Zales Jewelers among them.
Is Progressive Leasing still in business?
Yes. The settlement did not shut the company down. It imposed a $175 million judgment and an injunction requiring Progressive to disclose the total cost to own a product, stop misrepresenting its plans, obtain express informed consent before billing, and monitor the retailers that market its plans.
Is rent-to-own the same as financing a purchase?
No, and the difference is why the total cost matters. With a lease-to-own plan you are making periodic payments for the use of an item and only own it after completing the schedule or exercising a purchase option. That is why the total of all scheduled payments can substantially exceed the sticker price — in this case, the FTC said, frequently about double it.
Sources and official records
Every figure and date on this page was taken from the primary records below — court dockets, agency releases, and the settlement administrator's own notices. Payout averages we describe as averages are calculated from the official totals, not reported per-person estimates.
- FTC — Progressive Leasing Refunds page (September 2025 second round, $616.62 threshold)
- FTC case record — FTC v. Prog Leasing, LLC, File No. 182 3127, with the docket timeline
- FTC press release — the $175 million settlement and the conduct alleged
- FTC press release — June 2021 distribution of more than $172 million, averaging $85
Related settlements
Closed · Housing and rental fees
Invitation Homes $48 Million Junk Fee Settlement
About $106 average · Checks mailed March 2026 — no claim needed
Closed · Auto service contracts
CarShield $10 Million FTC Settlement
About $57 average · Checks mailed December 2025 — no claim needed
Closed · Credit and lending
Credit Karma $3 Million Pre-Approved Offers Settlement
About $49 average · Claims closed March 4, 2024
Closed · Student loans
Navient Student Loan Settlements
About $260 restitution; CFPB redress amounts not published · No claim needed — payments automatic
Closed · Cash advance apps
Brigit $18 Million FTC Settlement
Varied by customer · Two rounds paid — no claim needed
More settlements people are checking
Payout status for other settlements we track, updated as administrators publish new information.